What is your opinion of Icoms new ic 705?
I’m in need of a portable HF unit. I love the idea that this unit is both HF & VHF/UHF with lithium ion battery on board. Also same interface as the 7300. Only 10w but could carry an amp. What do you all think?
https://www.icomamerica.com/en/products/amateur/handheld/705/default.aspx -- ************************* Howard E. Mahran WA1HEM (425) 864 - 5104 *************************
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Re: Carnation to Rattlesnake LOS survey
Awesome Shawn! I'm interested in learning more about HAMWAN and how we can leverage it. Thank you and to the rest of the team driving this!
P.S. What software did you to create that map? -- ************************* Howard E. Mahran WA1HEM (425) 864 - 5104 *************************
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Re: Carnation to Rattlesnake LOS survey
Shawn / K7ATA
Grr. the screenshot I added didn't go through...resending
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
--Shawn --K7ATA
On 7/18/2020 9:58 AM, Shawn / K7ATA via groups.io wrote:
We (K7RWB, W7PFB, K7ATA) recently did a LOS (line-of-sight) survey from the carnation shack to the HAMWAN station atop Rattlesnake Ridge.
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Re: Carnation to Rattlesnake LOS survey
Mike Jacob
Cool!
I wasn't up to speed on HAMWAN.
From: snovarc@snovarc.groups.io <snovarc@snovarc.groups.io> on behalf of Shawn / K7ATA <shawn@...>
Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2020 9:58 AM To: snovarc@snovarc.groups.io <snovarc@snovarc.groups.io> Subject: [SnoVARC] Carnation to Rattlesnake LOS survey We (K7RWB, W7PFB, K7ATA) recently did a LOS (line-of-sight) survey from
the carnation shack to the HAMWAN station atop Rattlesnake Ridge. WITHOUT roof access (new locks, new code) we were able to do a verification of LOS with binoculars from the top of the external stairs, and I have also verified using multiple online tools. -- --Shawn --K7ATA
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Carnation to Rattlesnake LOS survey
Shawn / K7ATA
We (K7RWB, W7PFB, K7ATA) recently did a LOS (line-of-sight) survey from the carnation shack to the HAMWAN station atop Rattlesnake Ridge.
WITHOUT roof access (new locks, new code) we were able to do a verification of LOS with binoculars from the top of the external stairs, and I have also verified using multiple online tools. -- --Shawn --K7ATA
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Re: 10m tuneup - total disaster and embarrassing lesson learned
Don't pull too much hair out or you will look like me.......and that is a scary thought! I would be up for a Zoom VARA class. Thanks, Rowland
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 3:58 PM Howard E. Mahran / WA1HEM <wa1hem@...> wrote:
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Re: 10m tuneup - total disaster and embarrassing lesson learned
Paul (W7PFB) - you are correct. It was a good learning experience and exactly what the drill was for… (its still frustrating ;-) and It’ll take a while to grow back the patch of hair I pulled out trying to figure it all out :-)
Paul (W7PEZ) - the tuner you have works with your 7300 via the antenna tuner connection, which is really nice, so you won’t have the conflict of both units trying to tune at the same time. The one I have is not connected to the 7300 and is works independently - thus the conflict
*********************************** Howard Mahran (425) 864-5104 *********************************** -- ************************* Howard E. Mahran WA1HEM (425) 864 - 5104 *************************
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Re: 10m tuneup - total disaster and embarrassing lesson learned
Paul Butzi (W7PFB)
The problem with two tuners is that they’re solving for a tuning solution at the same time, at varying speeds and by adjusting impedances in different ways.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
In essence, each tuner is expecting a static target but the other tuner presents a moving target. Chaos ensues. BTW I would not call this a disaster at all, let alone a total disaster. Total disaster is when you run into this problem for the first time right after the world goes wahoonie shaped and the lives of your family are depending on things working. I think the correct term for this is “problem discovered and corrected during training”, which is sort of what training (and drills) are all about.
-p W7PFB
73, Don’t forget to smile and have fun!
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Re: 10m tuneup - total disaster and embarrassing lesson learned
Paul - here is the unit that I’m using… of course, there’s alway a high probability that I am not using it correctly.
*********************************** Howard Mahran (425) 864-5104 *********************************** -- ************************* Howard E. Mahran WA1HEM (425) 864 - 5104 *************************
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Re: 10m tuneup - total disaster and embarrassing lesson learned
Hmm, I don’t understand why they don’t work together? And doesn’t this happen anytime you’re on HF then? I have the LDG IT-100 tuner paired with my 7300. It tunes when I press the Tune button on the radio.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I don’t know why you’d consider this embarrassing as I don’t think it should happen at all. Seems like something isn’t working right. Embarrassing is when I tried to call in using 70cm on a 2m beam antenna. Doh! 🤦🏼
On Jul 17, 2020, at 12:00 PM, Howard E. Mahran / WA1HEM <wa1hem@...> wrote:
If my life depended on getting on 10m yesterday to report my location during a disaster - I'd be dead today. My 10m antenna is not the best to begin with. It's a 6-40m dipole. I get better luck with 10m sticks but I didn't have them set up. So for the tuneup, it was either the dipole or nothing. Just before the tuneup, I tuned my rigs SWR to less than 1.4. Ok so we start the tuneup and I was dead in the water.. couldn't get a message out also had lots of noise. My SWR started to swing wildly, causing my power to swing wildly from 100w to 0. Repeated attempts to retune failed. No one could hear me and when they did it was brief and wonky. I thought maybe my dipole crashed but a test with a meter showed a very tuneable 2.3 SWR on 29.52mhz. What the heck was going on? After pulling my hair out it turned out to be something so silly I'm actually a little embarrassed to mention it... but I'll swallow my pride in the hopes that my stupidity will potentially prevent someone else from the same frustrating debacle. I have an LDG 100 antenna tuner. Its two parts - the tuner is remote (out near the antenna) with a small control unit that sits indoors. I have mine on a shelf below my rig. It comes on automatically when I turn on the power supply. It's a very unassuming little guy. I totally forgot about it, as its so little and unobtrusive. What the LDG does is automatically try to tune the antenna- no input needed. So... you can see the problem... In combination with my 7300, which was also set to TUNE - I had the SWR equivalent of dueling banjos! They just fought with each other, swinging the SWR wildly and eventually shutting down the 7300's Tx power to save the finals (thank goodness for that protection!). Lesson learned. I finally shut off the LDG and just used the 7300's tuner. I think all was finally stable at the point... unfortunately... the exercise was long over.... ahhh... the lessons we learn... -- ************************* Howard E. Mahran WA1HEM (425) 864 - 5104 *************************
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Re: 10m tuneup - total disaster and embarrassing lesson learned
Paul Butzi (W7PFB)
Good on you for figuring it out!
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
-p W7PFB
73, Don’t forget to smile and have fun!
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Re: 10m tuneup - total disaster and embarrassing lesson learned
Howard, Do not feel too bad. We have all been there one way or another. That is the beauty of drilling. It let's you find the bad issues and correct them before a real event takes place and it is always great to publish them to all so we can learn from each other. Thanks, Rowland
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 12:00 PM Howard E. Mahran / WA1HEM <wa1hem@...> wrote: If my life depended on getting on 10m yesterday to report my location during a disaster - I'd be dead today. My 10m antenna is not the best to begin with. It's a 6-40m dipole. I get better luck with 10m sticks but I didn't have them set up. So for the tuneup, it was either the dipole or nothing. Just before the tuneup, I tuned my rigs SWR to less than 1.4.
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
10m tuneup - total disaster and embarrassing lesson learned
If my life depended on getting on 10m yesterday to report my location during a disaster - I'd be dead today. My 10m antenna is not the best to begin with. It's a 6-40m dipole. I get better luck with 10m sticks but I didn't have them set up. So for the tuneup, it was either the dipole or nothing. Just before the tuneup, I tuned my rigs SWR to less than 1.4.
Ok so we start the tuneup and I was dead in the water.. couldn't get a message out also had lots of noise. My SWR started to swing wildly, causing my power to swing wildly from 100w to 0. Repeated attempts to retune failed. No one could hear me and when they did it was brief and wonky. I thought maybe my dipole crashed but a test with a meter showed a very tuneable 2.3 SWR on 29.52mhz. What the heck was going on? After pulling my hair out it turned out to be something so silly I'm actually a little embarrassed to mention it... but I'll swallow my pride in the hopes that my stupidity will potentially prevent someone else from the same frustrating debacle. I have an LDG 100 antenna tuner. Its two parts - the tuner is remote (out near the antenna) with a small control unit that sits indoors. I have mine on a shelf below my rig. It comes on automatically when I turn on the power supply. It's a very unassuming little guy. I totally forgot about it, as its so little and unobtrusive. What the LDG does is automatically try to tune the antenna- no input needed. So... you can see the problem... In combination with my 7300, which was also set to TUNE - I had the SWR equivalent of dueling banjos! They just fought with each other, swinging the SWR wildly and eventually shutting down the 7300's Tx power to save the finals (thank goodness for that protection!). Lesson learned. I finally shut off the LDG and just used the 7300's tuner. I think all was finally stable at the point... unfortunately... the exercise was long over.... ahhh... the lessons we learn... -- ************************* Howard E. Mahran WA1HEM (425) 864 - 5104 *************************
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Re: RF Grounding - Finally an article that helped
Gerard Repko
Great article. Saved it for when I setup my new ham schack in Texas.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
73 KG7REV Gerard
On Jul 14, 2020, at 4:14 PM, Dale Smith <dale_smith@...> wrote:
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Re: RF Grounding - Finally an article that helped
Dale Smith <dale_smith@...>
Excellent! Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE device
------ Original message------ From: W7ABD Date: Mon, Jul 13, 2020 10:31 PM Cc: Subject:Re: [SnoVARC] RF Grounding - Finally an article that helped
Nice article on grounding. Thanks for sharing Howard! Jim W7ABD On 7/13/20 21:44, Howard E. Mahran /
WA1HEM wrote:
Sharing this article that I found very helpful as I design an RF grounding setup in my shack. Hope this helps someone as much as it helped me....
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Learn from 70+ speakers at the first–ever Virtual Ham Expo!!
Subject: Learn from 70+ speakers at the first–ever Virtual Ham Expo!!
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Re: RF Grounding - Finally an article that helped
W7ABD
Nice article on grounding. Thanks for sharing Howard!
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Jim W7ABD
On 7/13/20 21:44, Howard E. Mahran /
WA1HEM wrote:
Sharing this article that I found very helpful as I design an RF grounding setup in my shack. Hope this helps someone as much as it helped me....
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RF Grounding - Finally an article that helped
Sharing this article that I found very helpful as I design an RF grounding setup in my shack. Hope this helps someone as much as it helped me....
https://helpdesk.flexradio.com/hc/en-us/articles/204779159-Grounding-Systems-in-the-Ham-Shack-Paradigms-Facts-and-Fallacies -- ************************* Howard E. Mahran WA1HEM (425) 864 - 5104 *************************
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Re: Wire length question
Paul Butzi (W7PFB)
Apparently everyone else in SnoVARC either stays up later than I do or gets up earlier.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I vote with Dan - measure to the hole in the insulator. Any place where the wire is wrapped around itself, the effect is that doubled over portion does not contribute to the effective length. On the scale of any HF antenna the loop going thru the insulator is the same as a wire just reaching the eye of the insulator. And I also vote with everyone who says it doesn’t matter. You won’t know the velocity factor of the wire to better than, say, 2%, and that source of uncertainty alone means you’re going to end up tweaking the length using your handy antenna analyzer.
-p W7PFB
73, Don’t forget to smile and have fun!
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Re: Wire length question
I’m no expert but as I’ve played around with wire antennas, and reading ARRL publications, I believe any folded over length of wire is not counted. What matters is end to end reach of the conductor. The part wrapped around or folded back is not counted.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I do agree with Dan, the performance difference either way will be insignificant.
On Jul 11, 2020, at 10:04 PM, Howard E. Mahran / WA1HEM <wa1hem@...> wrote:
I realize this might be a silly question and the significance to the overall wire length minimal but the question is burning a hole in my head: Do you count the part of the wire that is tied around the ceramic insulator when measuring wire length ? I say “yes” <08C416AD-97C7-4404-877F-0AA41B5874B1.jpeg> -- ************************* Howard E. Mahran WA1HEM (425) 864 - 5104 *************************
|
|||||||
|